1972 Zastava 1300 vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz R

To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R (210 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercedes-Benz R weights approximately 1380 kg more than 1972 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R (542 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 449 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300. 2011 Mercedes-Benz R has automatic transmission and 1972 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1972 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mercedes-Benz R will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: