1972 Zastava 850 K vs. 2010 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Passat (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Passat should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Passat weights approximately 712 kg more than 1972 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Zastava 850 K | 2010 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | Zastava | Volkswagen |
Model | 850 K | Passat |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1567 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4775 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2710 mm |