1972 ZAZ 966 vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2007 Holden Epica is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1972 ZAZ 966. (27 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1972 ZAZ 966.
Because 1972 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 ZAZ 966 | 2007 Holden Epica | |
| Make | ZAZ | Holden |
| Model | 966 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 885 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2700 mm |
