1973 AC 428 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,002 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 AC 428 (298 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
Because 1973 AC 428 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 AC 428. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 AC 428 (639 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1973 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1973 AC 428 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | 428 | 3 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7002 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 298 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 639 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2639 mm |