1973 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1952 Austin A 40
To start off, 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfasud, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1952 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | Alfasud | A 40 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1185 cc | 1199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 41 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2360 mm |