1973 Alpina 2002 vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Alpina 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Alpina 2002 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 130 kg more than 1973 Alpina 2002.
Because 1973 Alpina 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Alpina 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Alpina 2002 | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | 2002 | Tempo |
Year Released | 1973 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2540 mm |