1973 Alpina 2002 vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Alpina 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Alpina 2002 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Alpina 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Alpina 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Alpina 2002 | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Alpina | Ford |
| Model | 2002 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |
