1973 Alpina 2002 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Alpina 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Alpina 2002 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 574 kg more than 1973 Alpina 2002.
Because 1973 Alpina 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Alpina 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Alpina 2002 | 2009 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Alpina | Chevrolet |
Model | 2002 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1554 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2860 mm |