1973 Alpine A 310 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1973 Alpine A 310 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Alpine A 310 (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1973 Alpine A 310.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Alpine A 310. (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Alpine A 310.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Alpine A 310 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Alpine | Triumph |
| Model | A 310 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1605 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |
