1973 Alpine A 310 vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 1,605 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Alpine A 310 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Alpine A 310 (128 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1973 Alpine A 310 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Alpine A 310. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Alpine A 310 | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 310 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1605 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2490 mm |