1973 Alpine A 310 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Lumina
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Alpine A 310 would be higher.
Because 1973 Alpine A 310 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Alpine A 310. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Alpine A 310 | 2006 Chevrolet Lumina | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 310 | Lumina |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
