1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III
To start off, 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 570 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | |
Make | Aston Martin | Austin-Healey |
Model | AM Vantage | 3000 Mk III |
Year Released | 1973 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1180 kg |