1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 865 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Riley |
| Model | AM Vantage | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 3995 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 885 kg |
