1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1996 Renault Clio. (250 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 100 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
| Model | AM Vantage | Clio |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3995 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 250 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1650 kg |
