1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 130 kg more than 2004 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
Model | AM Vantage | CTS |
Year Released | 1973 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1620 kg |