1973 Audi Asso vs. 1960 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1973 Audi Asso is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Audi Asso (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Audi Asso should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Ford Zodiac (187 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Audi Asso. (163 Nm). This means 1960 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Audi Asso.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Audi Asso | 1960 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | Asso | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1973 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 187 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2720 mm |