1973 Audi Asso vs. 1961 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1973 Audi Asso is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1973 Audi Asso. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1973 Audi Asso.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Audi Asso. (163 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Audi Asso.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Audi Asso | 1961 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | Asso | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3300 mm |
