1973 Audi Asso vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Audi Asso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Audi Asso would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1973 Audi Asso. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1973 Audi Asso.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Audi Asso. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Tundra (426 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Audi Asso. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Audi Asso.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Audi Asso | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | Asso | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3270 mm |
