1973 Audi Asso vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Audi Asso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Audi Asso would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1973 Audi Asso. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1973 Audi Asso.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Audi Asso. (163 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Audi Asso.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Audi Asso | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | Asso | XJ |
Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 541 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3040 mm |