1973 Audi Asso vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Audi Asso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Audi Asso would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Audi Asso (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (97 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Audi Asso should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Because 1973 Audi Asso is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Audi Asso. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Audi Asso (163 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (151 Nm). This means 1973 Audi Asso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Audi Asso | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
| Make | Audi | Renault |
| Model | Asso | Kangoo |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |
