1973 Audi Asso vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Audi Asso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Audi Asso would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1973 Audi Asso. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1973 Audi Asso.
Because 1973 Audi Asso is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Audi Asso. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 6 (226 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Audi Asso. (163 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Audi Asso.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Audi Asso | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | Asso | 6 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 226 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2789 mm |