1973 Audi Asso vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Audi Asso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Audi Asso would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 1973 Audi Asso. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1973 Audi Asso.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Audi Asso. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (508 Nm) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Audi Asso. (163 Nm). This means 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Audi Asso.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Audi Asso | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Audi | Land Rover |
Model | Asso | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 508 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2891 mm |