1973 Audi Asso vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Audi Asso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Audi Asso would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (152 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1973 Audi Asso. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1973 Audi Asso.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Equator (232 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Audi Asso. (163 Nm). This means 2012 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Audi Asso.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Audi Asso | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | Asso | Equator |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3200 mm |