1973 Audi Asso vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Audi Asso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Audi Asso would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1973 Audi Asso. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1973 Audi Asso.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Audi Asso. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Audi Asso. (163 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Audi Asso.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Audi Asso | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | Asso | XJ |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 89 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 5252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3157 mm |
