1973 Austin 1800 vs. 1970 Chevrolet C-10
To start off, 1973 Austin 1800 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chevrolet C-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chevrolet C-10 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 (250 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1973 Austin 1800. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin 1800.
Because 1970 Chevrolet C-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chevrolet C-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Austin 1800 | 1970 Chevrolet C-10 | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1800 | C-10 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 250 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
