1973 Austin 1800 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1973 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 155 kg more than 1973 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin 1800. (141 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin 1800 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 1800 | CU-X |
Year Released | 1973 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 80 L |