1973 Austin 1800 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Austin 1800 (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Austin 1800 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1973 Austin 1800.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Austin 1800 (141 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1973 Austin 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Austin 1800 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Austin | Suzuki |
| Model | 1800 | F1 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 45 L |
