1973 Austin 1800 vs. 2008 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 2,197 cc, 2008 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 270 kg more than 1973 Austin 1800.
Because 2008 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu KB (190 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin 1800. (141 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin 1800 | 2008 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Austin | Isuzu |
Model | 1800 | KB |
Year Released | 1973 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 2197 cc |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 141 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 94.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 75 L |