1973 Austin 1800 vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 274 more horse power than 1973 Austin 1800. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin 1800.
Because 2009 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin 1800. (141 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin 1800 | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | 1800 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 141 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |