1973 Austin 1800 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1973 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 376 kg more than 1973 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin 1800. (141 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin 1800 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | 1800 | BLS |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 265 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 58 L |