1973 Austin Allegro vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1973 Austin Allegro is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1973 Austin Allegro. (80 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1287 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1973 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1973 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Austin Allegro | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Allegro | 62 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1747 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 838 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 79 L |
