1973 Austin Allegro vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1973 Austin Allegro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 500 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Because 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin Allegro | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Austin | Studebaker |
Model | Allegro | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1973 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2980 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 68 L |