1973 Austin Allegro vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1973 Austin Allegro is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Taunus (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1973 Austin Allegro. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Taunus should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Taunus weights approximately 160 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Taunus (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (81 Nm @ 2450 RPM). This means 1963 Ford Taunus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin Allegro | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Allegro | Taunus |
Year Released | 1973 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2450 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 31 L |