1973 Austin Allegro vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1973 Austin Allegro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Austin Allegro (58 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 65 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Austin Allegro (93 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1973 Austin Allegro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin Allegro | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Austin | Riley |
Model | Allegro | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1973 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2380 mm |