1973 Austin Allegro vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1973 Austin Allegro is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1973 Austin Allegro. (71 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (132 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Austin Allegro | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Austin | Triumph |
| Model | Allegro | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1748 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.8 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 64 L |
