1973 Austin Allegro vs. 1982 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Because 1982 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin Allegro | 1982 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Allegro | Brougham |
Year Released | 1973 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3090 mm |