1973 Austin Allegro vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1973 Austin Allegro. (58 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 386 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (93 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin Allegro | 1982 Chrysler E | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Allegro | E |
Year Released | 1973 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2630 mm |