1973 Austin Allegro vs. 2000 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (1,154 Nm) has 1073 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (81 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin Allegro | 2000 Dodge Viper | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Allegro | Viper |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 7990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 1154 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 98.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2450 mm |