1973 Austin Allegro vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X

To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1973 Austin Allegro. (80 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 507 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (137 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1973 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1973 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: