1973 Austin Allegro vs. 2004 Ford Econoline

To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1973 Austin Allegro. (58 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1505 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (93 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro.

Compare all specifications: