1973 Austin Allegro vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,390 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 235 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (93 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin Allegro | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | Allegro | Clio |
Year Released | 1973 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 93 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 50 L |