1973 Austin Allegro vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1973 Austin Allegro. (48 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (81 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin Allegro | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | Allegro | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |