1973 Austin Allegro vs. 2009 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XK is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XK (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 362 more horse power than 1973 Austin Allegro. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XK weights approximately 820 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XK (560 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 479 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (81 Nm @ 2450 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro. 2009 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1973 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1973 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Austin Allegro | 2009 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Austin | Jaguar |
| Model | Allegro | XK |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 48 HP | 410 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 560 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2450 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 90.3 mm |
| Top Speed | 134 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2590 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 71 L |
