1973 Austin Allegro vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1973 Austin Allegro. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (81 Nm @ 2450 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin Allegro | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Allegro | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2450 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 134 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 65 L |