1973 Austin Allegro vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1973 Austin Allegro. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Renault Clio (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (81 Nm @ 2450 RPM). This means 2011 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Austin Allegro | 2011 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | Allegro | Clio |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 48 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2450 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 50 L |
