1973 Austin Marina vs. 1947 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1973 Austin Marina is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 230 kg more than 1973 Austin Marina.
Because 1947 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Austin Marina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1947 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1947 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Marina. (103 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1947 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin Marina | 1947 Jeep CJ2A | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Marina | CJ2A |
Year Released | 1973 | 1947 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2040 mm |