1973 Austin Maxi vs. 1981 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1981 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 976 kg more than 1973 Austin Maxi.
Because 1981 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Austin Maxi | 1981 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Maxi | Brougham |
Year Released | 1973 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1485 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3090 mm |