1973 Bitter CD vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Bitter CD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Bitter CD would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Bitter CD (226 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Bitter CD should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1973 Bitter CD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Bitter CD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Bitter CD (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1973 Bitter CD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Bitter CD | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Bitter | Ford |
Model | CD | E-350 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 57 L |