1973 BMW 1502 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 BMW 1502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 BMW 1502 would be higher. At 4,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1973 BMW 1502. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1973 BMW 1502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 BMW 1502 weights approximately 7 kg more than 2002 Toyota Tundra.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 BMW 1502. (130 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 BMW 1502.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 BMW 1502 | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | 1502 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1573 cc | 4698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 923 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |
