1973 BMW 2004 vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1973 BMW 2004 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 BMW 2004 (97 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 BMW 2004 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 90 kg more than 1973 BMW 2004.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 BMW 2004. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 BMW 2004 (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1973 BMW 2004 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 BMW 2004 | 1949 Jeep CJ2A | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 2004 | CJ2A |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2040 mm |
